We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or even the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
A lessen court might not rule against a binding precedent, regardless of whether it feels that it is unjust; it may well only express the hope that a higher court or perhaps the legislature will reform the rule in question. In case the court thinks that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and desires to evade it and help the regulation evolve, it may well possibly hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts of the cases; some jurisdictions allow for a judge to recommend that an appeal be performed.
Stacy, a tenant in the duplex owned by Martin, filed a civil lawsuit against her landlord, claiming he experienced not presented her sufficient notice before raising her rent, citing a completely new state law that requires a minimum of 90 times’ notice. Martin argues that the new law applies only to landlords of large multi-tenant properties.
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that might be consulted in deciding a current case. It may be used to guide the court, but isn't binding precedent.
As a result, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner has to pursue his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If these an appeal has not but been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner might then look for further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more
Lots of the volumes (including more recent volumes than the library's holdings) will also be out there online through the Caselaw Access Project.
All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in help from the Supreme Court, making certain the enforcement of its judgments. Since the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been achieved, the decision on the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) in the Constitution. Read more
Because of this, only citing the case is more very likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Think about it as calling a person to inform them you’ve found their dropped phone, then telling them you live in this kind of-and-these neighborhood, without actually offering them an address. Driving within the community looking to find their phone is likely to become more frustrating than it’s really worth.
In a few jurisdictions, case legislation could be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family legislation.
This Court may possibly interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding arrived at via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the summary or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mold the relief to make it appropriate for the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority could be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified from the decision in the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The legislation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair on the offender and also the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts Nonetheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The an abundance of this power casts an obligation around the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
Statutory laws are Individuals created by legislative bodies, for instance Congress at both the federal and state levels. While this sort of legislation strives to condition our society, supplying rules and guidelines, it would be extremely hard for virtually any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.
Given that the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been reached, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of your Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, Additionally it is a well-proven proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or website evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is issue to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.